On 12/28/2012 10:27 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
On 12/29/2012 01:06 AM, Arthur Richards wrote:
Thanks everyone for helping to clarify. The fact that there is still confusion, uncertainty, and 'from my understating's though is disconcerting. Can someone in the know document the actual implications/guidelines/automated behavior/etc for this? And can someone take responsibility for updating the documentation as this stuff evolves? We should be able to refer ourselves and others to a definitive resource when questions like this arise.
Be bold! The definitive source is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Workflow#How_we_review_code , but there are some parts there that is obsolete. Don't wait for an expert to come along and document everything. You can help too.
Along these lines, let me raise the attention for
Bug 36437 - A strict and correct Git workflow document is needed https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36437
and the effort that Dan has offered to lead to get this fixed:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Dan-nl/Git_and_Gerrit
Please help Dan and help yourselves by commenting his proposals and editing in any way that improves the current situation. Thank you!