On 13 December 2012 10:44, Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
More importantly while quality is nice, that's not what's really important. More important than quality is coverage. Getting photos of those things that we don't have photos for. That is where mobile devices will always be superior than said Nikon or Sony cameras. Images of things taken spur of the moment no-one has taken an image of yet. Especially in remote areas, sudden events, etc...
Every article on a place needs a video, for example. (That's why we need to be able to ingest absolutely any rubbish a phone can produce and upload.)
- d.