I think this is a great idea, but I also have a new idea for how we might go about using the RESOLVED -> VERIFIED -> CLOSED workflow in BugZilla, rather than just treating resolved as closed. One thing I noticed about MW is that we're very much lacking in the test planning area. What if a bug is marked as verified if either a) somebody makes and commits a test case for it or b) it is determined that a test case is not applicable. That way we'll have automated tests ensuring every bug we fix doesn't come back again. Any thoughts?
*--* *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo@gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mark A. Hershberger mah@everybody.orgwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/2012 09:17 AM, matanya wrote:
We didn't have a bug triage since May. I suggest organizing one in a few weeks (say 2?)
Wow! Thanks for taking this on! I'm busy with non-MW work, but I do have some time to help out.
Please CC me personally on any triage announcements or ping me on IRC (hexmode). Thanks!
Human evil is not a problem. It is a mystery. It cannot be solved. -- When Atheism Becomes a Religion, Chris Hedges -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFQL7VXc17xCi38v/URAsV7AKCiYFvnnIfSu8sU+/OvVxnboWQWWwCghdMy JpR0it7vfHlOOfr8OX5VbF8= =iBFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l