Hi Robert Stojnic and Gautham Shankar
I wanted to let Gautham that he has written a great proposal and thank you for the feedback as well.
I wanted to point out that in my point of view the main goal of this multilingual wordnet isn't queary expansion, but rather means for ever greater cross language capabilites in search and content analytics. A wordnet seme can be further disambiguated using a topic map algorithm run which would consider all the contexts like you suggest. But this is planned latter and so the wordnet would be a milestone. To further clarify Gautham's integration will place a XrossLanguage-seme Word Net tokens during indexing for words it recognises - allow the ranking algorithm to use knowldege drawn from all the wikipedia articles. (For example one part of the ranking would peek into featured article in German on "A" rank it >> then "B" featured in Hungarian and use them as oracles to rank A >> B >> ... in English where the picture might now be X
Y >> Z >> ... B >> A ...)
I mention in passing that I have began to develop dataset for use with open relavance to sytematicly review and evaluate dramatic changes to relevance due to changes in the search engine. I will post on this in due course as it matures - since I am working on a number of smaller projects i'd like to demo at WikiMania.)
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Gautham Shankar < gautham.shankar@hiveusers.com> wrote:
Robert Stojnic <rainmansr <at> gmail.com> writes:
Hi Gautham,
I think mining wiktionary is an interesting project. However, about the more practical Lucene part: at some point I tried using wordnet to expand queries however I found that it introduces too many false positives. The most challenging part I think it *context-based* expansion. I.e. a simple synonym-based expansion is of no use because it introduces too many meanings that the user didn't quite have in mind. However, if we could somehow use the words in the query to find a meaning from a set of possible meanings that could be really helpful.
You can look into existing lucene-search source to see how I used wordnet. I think in the end I ended up using it only for very obvious stuff (e.g. 11 = eleven, UK = United Kingdom, etc..).
Cheers, r.
On 06/04/12 01:58, Gautham Shankar wrote:
Hello,
Based on the feedback i received i have updated my proposal page.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Gautham_shankar/Gsoc
There is about 20 Hrs for the deadline and any final feedback would be useful. I have also submitted the proposal at the GSOC page.
Regards, Gautham Shankar _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hi Robert,
Thank you for your feedback. Like you pointed out, query expansion using the wordnet data directly, reduces the quality of the search.
I found this research paper very interesting. www.sftw.umac.mo/~fstzgg/dexa2005.pdfhttp://www.sftw.umac.mo/%7Efstzgg/dexa2005.pdf They have built a TSN (Term Semantic Network) for the given query based on the usage of words in the documents. The expansion words obtained from the wordnet are then filtered out based on the TSN data.
I did not add this detail to my proposal since i thought it deals more with the creation of the wordnet. I would love to implement the TSN concept once the wordnet is complete.
Regards, Gautham Shankar
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hi again