Out of curiosity, what is the reasoning behind having the /zh-tw and /zh-cn pages indicate that the /wiki pages are canonical? It seems a bit strange to say that they're more or less the same page when their content isn't really equivalent and is targeted at different sets of users.
Shen
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Liangent liangent@gmail.com wrote:
You can ask Facebook to make a change: load the page specified by you and display it to you, and load another canonical version to store (so they can do proper link count etc.)...
-Liangent
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Liangent liangent@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it's because we have <link rel="canonical" href="http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gmail" /> in page source, so Facebook is fetching the canonical (variant-neutral) version (and this is expected, since http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/Gmail and http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/Gmail refer to the same article), where zh is used as the interface language. However zh falls back to zh-hans, so all interface messages are in zh-hans.
-Liangent
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:49 AM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
Gentlemen, no matter if in Google search results, or Facebook link previews, links that specifically have the zh-tw part in them http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/ ... still end up having simplified Chinese, despite no such simplified
<title> >> appearing in the entire page. >> I suspect somehow the simplified Chinese version is considered Cache >> Equivalent for <title> purposes ... but it is not and looks horrible to >> me trying to present a fully Traditional appearing link. >> Go ahead and test, share "http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/Gmail" via >> Facebook, and notice the simplified Chinese there in the title of the >> link created. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> >
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l