On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Roan Kattouw <roan.kattouw(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, MZMcBride
<z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
I asked roughly the same thing yesterday (more
along the lines of "shouldn't
it take someone ten minutes to add memcache support to the extension?").
Reedy said it was long-running queries that never timed out that apparently
caused the issue.
I read the code and sent some unsolicited advice to the fundraising
team. Essentially, the recaching operation could be doing ~35 times
fewer queries, that should help.
Roan
Wasn't the extension ever reviewed before being enabled? Shouldn't of
the review catch-ed this?