On 28/11/11 14:57, Roan Kattouw wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM,
MZMcBride<z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
I asked roughly the same thing yesterday (more
along the lines of "shouldn't
it take someone ten minutes to add memcache support to the extension?").
Reedy said it was long-running queries that never timed out that apparently
caused the issue.
I read the code and sent some unsolicited advice to the fundraising
team. Essentially, the recaching operation could be doing ~35 times
fewer queries, that should help.
Roan
And adding memcached caching with even, say, as little as a 1 minute
cache entry timeout, should dilute that reduced load even more, and put
an upperbound on the load generated, just in case it gets
slashdot/reddited again.
-- Neil