Olivier Beaton <olivier.beaton(a)gmail.com> writes:
What do I gain by not using gpl? Commercial use and
forking under a license
of your choice. The only thing that concerns me using bsd is how to accept
contributions that im not merging in safely.
Others have said here, and I agree, that if you modify an extension
which uses the BSD license, then you are releasing your modifications
using the license that the extension is released under.
If you want to make it really clear to people working on the code use a
license header. You can see how this is done on a large projects
(albeit ones that use only a single license) by looking at Emacs[1] or
FreeBSD[2].
Point being: I think you're trying to solve a non-problem. If you're
really worried about how to accept contributions and think your
situation is truly unique, consult a lawyer. Otherwise, follow the
example of others who have gone before you.
Mark.
Footnotes:
[1]
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/lisp/ -- every.el
file is pre-pended with
;; GNU Emacs is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
;; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
;; the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
;; (at your option) any later version.
[2]
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/ -- every .c file is pre-pended
with
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.