"Platonides" <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:imm5c2$rib$1@dough.gmane.org...
Ilmari Karonen wrote:
I think it might be a good idea to split these two cases into separate
states. My suggestion, off the top of my head, would be to leave
"fixme" for the latter and add a new "broken" status for the former.
+1
We should also add another state for fixmes that are not about problems
in the revision itself, but request for improving more code (eg. you
should fix the same thing -added in MW 1.4- in other 10 locations of the
code, too).
That sort of thing should be a tag, because it is orthogonal to (and can
actually change independently of) the status of the revision itself. It
would make it impossible to 'ok' the revision without losing the 'extend'
information, which is exactly the opposite of what we want.
--HM
Right. We should use an improve tag and stop using fixmes for that.