"Chad" <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:AANLkTikrRE_3O+pYCjdX2+QiL6zT3tPohQuCodwE_SrU@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Siebrand Mazeland
<s.mazeland(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
Also, the
comment about code review is also a point. Right now, CodeReview
does not support Git, and really the implementation was never built
with Git in mind. I think we could hack it in, but it wouldn't be pretty
and if Git's the answer then I think we'll be leaving this tool in favor
of something else (I and many others like Gerrit quite a bit).
To my mind, this is one of the most important points. We have built up a
very comprehensive infrastructure for code review in SVN, and there is a lot
of manhours behind that work; and just as many hours associated with setting
up a replacement system for git. Who is going to put that infrastructure in
place, in amongst all the many other priorities we have at the moment?
Moving to a VCS which makes it "easier to review stuff" **in principle** is
going to be of no use whatsoever if it sends the **practical
implementation** of that review process back to the stone age.
--HM