On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 15:25, Siebrand Mazeland <s.mazeland(a)xs4all.nl> wrote:
Please convince me that things will not be as hard as
I describe above, or
will most definitely not turn out as I fear. I am open to improvements,
but moving to GIT without addressing these concerns for the sake of having
this great DVCS is not justified IMO.
I think the last time this came up I asked you why the difficulty of
what you have to do is a function of the number of repositories you
have to push to.
That shouldn't be the case, that's trivially scriptable. You'd still
be reviewing the same *content*. You'd just push to more locations.
So it's easy to get this right for you in Git, and you're the only
person AFAIC with this use case.