On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Roan Kattouw roan.kattouw@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/22 Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com:
I've actually come to partially agree with you since the last time we discussed this. Really, the extension repository *should* remain in Subversion as it is. I would, however, like to move phase3 to git. Then i18n can just be two commits, instead of 400+
Extensions in SVN but phase3 in git? That doesn't really make sense to me, TBH. Would it really be the end of the world if we had phase3 in one repo and all extensions in another repo?
Perhaps in the long run. I think in the short-run it'd be more pain-free and perhaps a useful experiment to just move phase3 to git. Then we can see how we feel about moving the rest over (or if we hate it and want to go back)
-Chad