2011/3/22 Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com>om>:
I've actually come to partially agree with you
since the last time we
discussed this. Really, the extension repository *should* remain in
Subversion as it is. I would, however, like to move phase3 to git.
Then i18n can just be two commits, instead of 400+
Extensions in SVN but phase3 in git? That doesn't really make sense to
me, TBH. Would it really be the end of the world if we had phase3 in
one repo and all extensions in another repo?
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)