Alex Brollo wrote:
Thanks Roan, your statement sound very alarming for
me; I'll open a specific
thread about into wikisource-l quoting this talk. I'm doing any efford to
avoid server/history overload, since I know that I am using a free service
(I just fixed {{loop}} template to optimize it into it.source, at my
best...) and if you are right, I've to change deeply my approach to #lst.
:-(
Alex
The reason that labelled section transcluding is only enabled on
wikisources, some wiktionaries... is that it is inefficient. Thus your
proposal of enable it everywhere would be a bad idea. However, I am just
remembering things said in the past. I haven't reviewed it myself.
Do not try to be over-paranoid on not using the fetaures you have
available. You can ask for advice if something you have done is sane or
not, of course.
An interesting point is that labelled section transclusion is enabled on
French wikipedia. It's strange that someone got tricked into enabling it
on that 'big' project. I wonder how is it being used there.