Alex Brollo wrote:
Thanks Roan, your statement sound very alarming for me; I'll open a specific thread about into wikisource-l quoting this talk. I'm doing any efford to avoid server/history overload, since I know that I am using a free service (I just fixed {{loop}} template to optimize it into it.source, at my best...) and if you are right, I've to change deeply my approach to #lst.
:-(
Alex
The reason that labelled section transcluding is only enabled on wikisources, some wiktionaries... is that it is inefficient. Thus your proposal of enable it everywhere would be a bad idea. However, I am just remembering things said in the past. I haven't reviewed it myself.
Do not try to be over-paranoid on not using the fetaures you have available. You can ask for advice if something you have done is sane or not, of course. An interesting point is that labelled section transclusion is enabled on French wikipedia. It's strange that someone got tricked into enabling it on that 'big' project. I wonder how is it being used there.