On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
...snip...
This seems like a real problem. If Jack wants someone to review his
code, should he simply move it back from "deferred" to "new"? What
criteria are used to mark something as "deferred" in the first place?
I'm assuming it's currently standard practice to mark extensions that
aren't slated for deployment by WMF as "deferred"; do I have that
right?
Rob
See
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_Review and
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_review_guide
-Peachey