On 11/11/2010 21:37, Marco Schuster wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:07 PM, David
Gerard<dgerard <at> gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 November 2010 19:55, MZMcBride<z
<at> mzmcbride.com> wrote:
The muted colors are a nice start, but I think
the yellow still really
sticks out when the logos are presented as a family. Maybe the petal color
could be changed?
I think this not being a photo does not make it better than the photo
version. It's entirely unclear there's enough of a problem to be
solved here.
I think it does look better than the older version, nice work.
+1
I think this is already an improvement, though more could be done (e.g.
get rid of the shadow completely, maybe use a slightly warmer yellow or
more of a colour fade). For comparison: I recently re-designed the SMW
logo completely, picking up the MW flower theme. The result is at:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Logo
No shadows there, but more heavy bordering lines. Essentially two
colours. Some prominent colour transitions and blur to add some life.
Markus
The shadows are gone (as well as the black outline of the petals) and
the whole thing more simplified to better fit the "basic shapes look"
of the other logos.
I tried a version with red petals (as red is the only realistic color
out of red, blue & green) but I'm not a huge fan of it. It would as
well mean giving up the tournesol aspect (as there are no red
tournesols) The red version is here:
