On 23 March 2010 23:19, K. Peachey <p858snake(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Trevor Parscal
<tparscal(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> I think we should really consider LOLCODE for this
sort of thing.
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolcode
> It's just more fun!
Also rewrite parser functions to use it? that would be
interesting on
en.wiki since they are always complaining about the syntax.
I can think of little more appropriate.
- d.