Artur Fijałkowski schrieb:
2010/8/19 Daniel Kinzler daniel@brightbyte.de:
- extra channels that include full text, diffs, etc? UDP is a limiting factor
here. Alternative transport from PHP to the bridge process?
Named pipes? Of course only if PHP can keep named pipe open in persistent mode. I'm not sure if this is easy or even possible at all ;)
Never done much with these, but woudn't they get confused if multiple php processes accessed a named pipe at once? also, can a named pipe be connected to a tcp stream? Hm, I guess the letter could simply by done with cat my.pipe | socat tcp:...
Otoh, I don't think opening the pipe for every edit (not request!) would be prohibitively expensive. Might be a possibility. Actually, XMLRC already supports writing to a file, so no change to the extension would be needed at all.
-- daniel