Artur FijaĆkowski schrieb:
2010/8/19 Daniel Kinzler
<daniel(a)brightbyte.de>de>:
2) extra channels that include full text, diffs,
etc? UDP is a limiting factor
here. Alternative transport from PHP to the bridge process?
Named pipes? Of course only if PHP can keep named pipe open in
persistent mode. I'm not sure if this is easy or even possible at all
;)
Never done much with these, but woudn't they get confused if multiple php
processes accessed a named pipe at once? also, can a named pipe be connected to
a tcp stream? Hm, I guess the letter could simply by done with cat my.pipe |
socat tcp:...
Otoh, I don't think opening the pipe for every edit (not request!) would be
prohibitively expensive. Might be a possibility. Actually, XMLRC already
supports writing to a file, so no change to the extension would be needed at all.
-- daniel