David Gerard wrote:
On 3 August 2010 00:17, Edward Z. Yang
<ezyang(a)mit.edu> wrote:
2. Distributors roll patches without telling
upstream developers who
would happily accept them into the mainline.
Has anyone reported the following as Debian bugs?
* Package maintainer not sending patches back upstream
* Package maintainer not visible and active in MediaWiki development
* Package maintainer not visible and active in MediaWiki community
support, leaving supporting his packages to the upstream
- d.
In fact, one of their patches was sent upstream a couple of months ago
and we didn't react to it.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24132
It's a documentation patch, fine as it is, although i'd prefer to fix
that by moving dumpBackup to the new Maintenance style.
Other patches are not so fine...
wfSuppressWarnings();
- session_start();
+ @session_start();
wfRestoreWarnings();
Sure, it was for FusionForge package, but still what error would
session_start produce that is not trapped? (I can only make an E_NOTICE
or E_WARNING...)