On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:58 AM, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
We should definitely highlight real downtime as a reason for funding, especially in a way that discusses practical steps that would be taken to reduce the problem and how much those steps would cost.
Interesting point. Commercial organisations would never issue a press release highlighting poor performance, because they want people to think they're getting good value for money. A charity on the other hand...what does wikipedia have to lose from people thinking its servers are unreliable due to lack of funding?