That would be great. I second this notion whole
heartedly.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Russell Blau wrote:
"Brion Vibber"
<brion(a)wikimedia.org> wrote in message
news:497F9C35.9050500@wikimedia.org...
On 1/27/09 2:55 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Brion Vibber<brion(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>> On 1/27/09 2:35 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> The way I see it, what we need is to get a really powerful server
>> Nope, it's a software architecture issue. We'll restart it with
>> the new
>> arch when it's ready to go.
> The simplest solution is just to kill the current dump job if you
> have
> faith that a new architecture can be put in place in less than a
> year.
We'll probably do that.
-- brion
FWIW, I'll add my vote for aborting the current dump *now* if we
don't
expect it ever to actually be finished, so we can at least get a
fresh dump
of the current pages.
Russ
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org