Hoi, There is RDF, there is Semantic MediaWiki. Why should one get a push and the other not. Semantic MediaWiki is used on production websites. Its usability is continuously being improved. No cobwebs there.
Having machine readable information is great, but would it not make more sense to have human readable text. As in not only English ? Thanks, GerardM
2009/1/30 Daniel Kinzler daniel@brightbyte.de
Brianna Laugher schrieb:
I agree that it makes a lot of sense. But because it would be a big change, I fear that unless the lead developers show great enthusiasm for the idea, it will take a very long time to be accepted and completed. Whereas building an "add-on" tool can be faster to get to point of functionality.
Guys, before re-inventing several wheels, please look at what we already have.
Please have a look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Tag_categories, which defines a way to make license tags machine readable. Using that scheme, it would be easy to build a script on the toolserver that delivers metadata in a machine readable form. No need for screen scraping.
Also, please consider http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RDF which provides a way for mediawiki to serve machine readable metadata about anything and everything. It would be easy to integrate it into license tags. It has been around for years, all it needs is a little push from the community and some code review.
-- daniel
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l