"Mathias Schindler"
<mathias.schindler(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:48502b480811271913q72b9755bw8233ddef0d88f9dc@mail.gmail.com...
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Lars Aronsson
<lars(a)aronsson.se> wrote:
What other estimates of Wikipedia quality do we
have, that can be
applied across language versions?
The completeness of
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have
and the ratio of the quantity metrics of those articles (number of
authors, number of edits, number of bytes and all of that stuff and
the ratio of the metrics of the 1k-List to the other articles in the
same language edition.
This has been around for over year in the at "List of Wikipedias by sample
of articles".
There seems to have been a fair bit of discussion about the algorithm, so it
might be pretty representative by now, though I can't comment directly as I
haven't looked into it myself (I'm basing that statement just on a quick
scan of the talk page).
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias_by_sample_of_articles
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)