Roan Kattouw wrote:
That would be significantly harder to implement, and
also potentially
confusing. Writing an extension that implements <comment></comment> is
ridiculously easy, whereas introducing new syntax of another kind would
be very hard on pretty much everyone whose name isn't Tim Starling :)
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
Agree. Much better to add a <htmlcomment> and changing it to a shorter
name if needed would be trivial.
Now, some implementation details:
What to with a --> inside a html comment? And -- ?