Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
I'm actually pushing it farther than that: I'm
asserting that *even if
the artist requested that I take his photo whilst he was showing off
said painting* (which perhaps he just won an award for) that the
appearance of the painting in the photograph is incidental and incurs
me no derivation of his copyright.
You don't get it, do you? You're trying to convince *us* on this
list, while in the real case you need to convince the *owner* of
the copyright of the painting and a *judge* in a court of law.
In order to convince anybody here, you need to point to legal
cases where your principle has prevailed.
--
Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik -
http://aronsson.se