Mike O wrote:
Is there any advantage or deteriment to using
both eAccelerator AND
memcached on the same single server Wikipedia mirror on a relatively
low traffic site? The reason I ask is that eAccelerator is installed
as a PHP plugin and memcached is also installed. MediaWiki is set to
use memcached for caching, however eAccelerator picks up on the PHP
script and caches them too. So I'm wondering if that's a good idea
(possibly redudant) or should I disabled eAccel in favor of
memcached? Far as I know memcached is set to use 128MB of RAM at the
moment. eAccelerator appears to be set to use 32MB, if that matters
for answering the question.
Well, try it both ways and see which way gives you better performance... :)
- -- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)
I've been doing that, and just using a browser to view pages it's hard to tell.
Thus my question. I figure since a few people here work on development they might have an
answer...
Mike O
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at
http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze