"Rob Church" robchur@gmail.com wrote in message news:e92136380701182233n7ca0b150l6b47d6bd803aa952@mail.gmail.com...
On 18/01/07, Travis Derouin
travis@wikihow.com wrote:
That page seems to pick up pages in the user and talk namespaces as well. Is there much value in adding a special page to the list of extensions that lists main namespace pages that have links to articles that don't exist in the main namespace? I know we'll use it, but we have a different flow of creating pages and dealing with broken links than Wikipedia.
The four questions I usually ask myself before committing an extension
are:
- Is it well written, secure (to my knowledge), etc?
- Do I want to release the code for this?
- Is someone else going to find it useful?
- Has it been done better in the repo?
I like to think that #1 is always a "yes", and #2 is usually a "yes" as well, so generally what I go for is satisfying #3 and #4.
In your case, I think you'd be satisfying both of those; I don't see why someone else wouldn't find it useful, and I don't believe there's anything like it in the repository to date.
If it easy to add a namespace selector to the top of the page (like on Special:Allpages) and a tick-box to specify whether to only show broken links that start and end in this namespace, or all broken links within the namespace, then it will be of a lot more general use.
If it's not so easy and the code gets added to the MW codebase without it, I'd suggest logging this as an enhancement.
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)