Uses? How about [[:Intersection:FA-Class hurricane articles:: Top-importance
hurricane articles|Top-Importance FA-Class hurricane articles]] in the
English Wikipedia, providing links for
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Tropical_c
yclone_articles_by_quality_statistics and its 320+ siblings? That page needs
28 intersections to be fully linked, and other big projects within
[[WP:1.0/I]] will need probably as many.
Titoxd
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Flaschen [mailto:matthew.flaschen@gatech.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:03 AM
To: Wikimedia developers
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Category Intersections: "Proof of Concept Page"
feedback, please?
Samuel Wantman wrote:
Subject: Re:
[Wikitech-l] Category Intersections: "Proof of Concept Page"
feedback, please?
Message: 6
Steve Bennett wrote:
That shouldn't even be necessary. That just creates the semantic
problems we have. It could be as simple as
[[:Intersect:American|Actors|Link text]]
That reminds me. What about category unions?
Rick Block and I spent some time discussing the syntax for intersections
(see [[Wikipedia:Category intersection]] or the shortcut
[[WP:CI]]). Since there can be more than two categories involved, and
you'd still want to pipe how it was displayed, we came up with:
[[:Intersection:Actors::Americans::Living people|Living American actors]]
You're right. That's better, because you don't always have to have link
text (though you probably should).
The only thing missing would be unions of only some of
the
subcategories, for instance, the union of Comedy films and Drama films, or
Poets and Novelists. For most topics these do not
seem very significant.
I'm fairly sure people would come up with uses. It shouldn't be much
additional work to do this if intersections are already being done.
Matthew Flaschen