On Dec 30, 2007 5:32 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 31/12/2007, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Before you go off too far on this idea, I'm
about to float something
on wikien-l about a new "Trivia:" namespace...
If it's encyclopaedic, it should go in the main namespace, if it's
not, it shouldn't be in Wikipedia. Either way, a trivia namespace is
not required.
Trivia is not for non-encyclopedic stuff. It's for stuff about which
notability has not achieved consensus, but which has some claim to
notability.
The same rules would apply there, but instead of AFDing non-notable
stuff, you do an article move to Trivia:Article. It still has to meet
RS, V, NOR, BLP, etc.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com