Steve Bennett wrote:
Are HFCS's bad? They also reduce the chances of edit conflict don't they?
(I assume HFCS = "high frequency consecutive saves"). Some people don't like them (they inflate edit count, use resources). Thus I try to reduce them myself. But I'm prone to HFCS myself (not on templates!).
The thing I don't get in this mockup is, why would you have multiple drafts for one article?
Why limit to only one? I can imagine having several backups, going to older variants if I see I'm on a wrong track.
An undo function comes to mind. Revert before published.
That might lead to private revision trees per user and page, forked at some time in the past. Duh.
Just some ugly brainstorming ;-) ...