On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Steve Bennett wrote:
On 8/14/06, Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com wrote:
The problem, Lars, is that several of the partisans on the "WYSIWYG should take over the world" side of the argument are framing approaches that would, in fact, force us -- practically -- to use WYSIWYG editing: I don't think *anyone* who edits in wikitext now would bother if they had to do it in XML.
I certainly wouldn't.
Rob wouldn't either.
Can we just take it as read that any "solution" which involves a strict choice between WYSIWYG and editing in XML is not viable, not attractive and not worth further discussing?
You can, I can. I'm not sure what Simetrical and Christiaan would think about that proposal, though. :-)
Cheers, -- jr 'take it as read. hee.' a