Charlie, Lydia, Lucie, and Wikdiatans,
It's so great to have two examples of undergraduate theses that are both Wikidata and computer science focused. (CC WUaS seeks to require an undergraduate thesis in all countries' main languages for free best STEM-centric CC OCW degrees, accrediting on CC MIT OCW in 7 languages and CC Yale OYC to begin). CC WUaS seeks to develop CC MIT OCW much much further in CC Wikdiata/Wikibase and with AI, machine learning and machine translation - and these theses are the first! :)
Thank you for writing (and focusing) these! Scott https://twitter.com/WorldUnivAndSch
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, To be honest, I think that it is important to patrol changes in the changed data. However, accepting changes manually on all Wikipedias does not scale. You are completely right in this. When changes occur in Wikidata, it will result in changes everywhere in the same way as changes at Commons.
When a change at Wikidata has been "patrolled", it is imho up to a Wikipedia to accept patrolled changes. In this way changes only need to be accepted once for all our projects. When they want to patrol locally as well, it is their choice as are the consequences of the extra work load and the negligible benefit of this effort. The problem I see is that the people who are most likely to insist on more work are not the ones who will be do this work. Thanks, GerardM
On 4 June 2016 at 11:55, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Given Lydias post I wonder if it is to be expected that editors on Wikipedia shall manually import statements from Wikidata, as this is what can be read out of this thesis. This will create a huge backlog of work on all Wikipedias, and I can't see how we possibly can do this. For the moment we have a huge backlog on sources on nowiki, and adding a lot of additional manual work will not go very well with the community.
What is the plan, can Lydia or some else please clarify?
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:43 PM, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Page 21, moving to manual import of statements. I would really like to see the analysis written out that ends in this conclusion. It is very tempting, but the idea don't scale.
We have now about 5-10 000 articles per active user. Those users have a huge backlog of missing references. If they shall manage statements in addition to their current backlog, then they will simply be overwhelmed.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Lydia Pintscher < Lydia.Pintscher@wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hey folks :)
Charlie has been working on concepts for making it possible to edit Wikidata from Wikipedia and other wikis. This was her bachelor thesis. She has now published it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Facilitating_the_use_of_Wikidata_in_... I am very happy she put a lot of thought and work into figuring out all the complexities of the topic and how to make this understandable for editors. We still have more work to do on the concepts and then actually have to implement it. Comments welcome.
Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 10963 Berlin www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata