Carol's productive contributions outweigh the trolling she's been put
through and occasional policy issue she has run in to, at least not to the
point of warranting a site ban. Neotarf is being topic-banned from a
project they were a productive contributor to on a handful of flimsy
diffs. I'd bet $20 that either no civility block sticks to Eric or it ends
in another arb case within four months. Eric's a prolific content
contributor who has for at least two years regularly used the same gendered
slur and refused to acknowledge a problem with it or with his behavior in
general. Like Betacommand, the content contributions driven off by his
behavior greatly outnumber his own. The decision as it stands is ENWP's
arbcom explicitly saying they don't care about one of five aimed metrics
WMF to back strategic priorities.
----
Kevin Gorman
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Tim Davenport <shoehutch(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>Kevin
Gorman wrote: "The case is ending with banning a bunch of women
with flimsy
excuses.."
That's a gross misrepresentation of the case outcome.
The case is ending with Carol Moore being banned off for reasons which
should be obvious to anyone reading through the case documentation and
knowing of her previous case before this Arbcom.
Neotarf (who has made it clear that they have never identified as male or
female) is being topic-banned from participating in the GGTF.
Eric Corbett is going to be under a new regimen of non-appealable civility
blocks under the aegis of Arbitration Enforcement.
Sitush has been warned for his creation of a Carol Moore biography.
That's pretty much it.
No "bunch of women" being singled out and stricken for no reason. A couple
people judged to be disruptionists are being shown the door. The summary
Kevin makes is ridiculous.
Tim Davenport
Corvallis, OR
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap