I don't think I've heard/read
"chick" for several years.
From,
Emily
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:41 AM, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Sarah Stierch
<sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've had a few conversations, and heard/read a number of comments about
the
term "WikiChix." Now I've never
been much of a "chick", and it seems
other
women tend to agree in the terminology as being a
bit...hokey, old
school
and not the most contemporary.
I'd like to see how we can re-develop the concept into something else.
I've
been using just the simple term of "Women in
Wikimedia" etc, but I know
that's not the most quirky or exciting sound term when it comes to
trying to
be clever at a luncheon or whatever. There's
also the "Women of
Wikimedia"
but "WoW"...hehe... "Oh is this a
Warcraft meet-up?"
I also joined the WikiChix mailing list over a month and ago and there
has
been no activity. I'm starting to think
perhaps we can retire the term
for
the sake of contemporary thinking.
But, perhaps I'm just being uber and everyone thinks it's the cutest
name
ever and should be kept.
Thoughts?
If you contribute to Wikisource, you can become a wikisourcerer, which
has a nice ring to it..
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org