On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg
<jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of
sexuality and reproduction
are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are
self-evidently not good for attracting high quality photographs. What
processes should we put in place to encourage good quality photographs
of this kind. e.g. should we set up a separate OTRS queue to process
the paperwork for these photographs? Should it be managed by
verified non-anonymous women only?
This last point is an excellent suggestion. Lots of people would be
rightly reluctant to email a completely anonymous email address, read
by lots of people, about such a sensitive issue. If there were a
dedicated address, where the complaint would be read and handled only
by other women, that could make a huge difference.
Sarah
What shows up in a OTRS request is your username and your email address.
However, the nature of most objectionable material usually reveals
identity. My thought is that there should be a women's OTRS address which
handles any request, including matters which do not relate to images,
which women want to address only to women. If that makes it easier to
approach us regarding delicate issues it should be available. I suppose
there would have to also be women only review.
However, I'm not real sure how material is assigned to queues within
OTRS, so the possibility exists of a request being viewed by a man on its
way to the women's queue.
Fred