Brion Vibber wrote: You and other Pywikipediabot fans keep saying that on this list, but it never changed the fact that people are more passionate about writing their own scripts than they are about learning some obscure never-heard-of programming language for the only purpose of reading someone else's code which will probably turn out to be unsatisfactory anyway. Timwi

Maybe I didn't say this at the beginning, but I wanted this list to serve as interwikibot coordination between different wikimedia sites. Users would not discuss pywikipediabot hacking, but rather send warning files from robot runs, discuss disambig problems, etc. From my point of view it would be more dynamic than what we have now, that is [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki_bot] Maybe I'm wrong, so please correct me. I'm open for discussion. :) -- Palica http://sk.wikipedia.org/User:Palica Don't forget to take your Wikamins today. - Palica

Brion: A request for a list like this has been made before (although I couldn't find the specific thread when I searched), your comments reflects that you don't quite understand why people want such a list. * It would NOT be a development list, you could go to a development list like pywikipediabot-users or anura-dev for that. * It would not be a list where people discuss a particular bot program, the list you suggested is offtopic for anything but pywikipediabot. Rather it would be: * An announcement list for pywikipedia-warnfiles (which is offtopic at pywikipediabot-users since it's a development list) * A discussion of any other *wikimedia-related* bot issues, which are offtopic at pywikipediabot-users since that list is intended for general development of a python interface to MediaWiki installations.

Thank you :) -- Palica http://sk.wikipedia.org/User:Palica Nezabudni si vziať svoje Wikamíny. / Don't forget to take your Wikamins today. - Palica http://sk.wikipedia.org - slobodná encyklopédia, ktorú môže každý upravovať - AJ TY