The user was probably op'ed and saw the messages, since CIA-* is globally +q (quietened) in the channel.

Is there any point in keeping the CIA bots in #mediawiki ? We might as well remove it.

I don't even think it's possible to use them, since they only support svn

On 23/04/2012 13:38, Petr Bena wrote: Wrong. They support all the big name (Distributed) Version Control Systems... or they have done until fairly recently, I think all the hooks should still work although mail -> cia.vc doesn't work anymore. I really should get round to doing my documentation update on cia.vc as I'm "support staff" or  something like that there. If anyone wants to know how to manage a CIA.vc bot (so how the projects work, and how to manage what a bot shouts out), find me on IRC... I've already used my "staff" powers to fix CIA bots in various Wikimedia channels after some angry banned user has caused havock. -- Lewis Cawte > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Antoine Musso<hashar+wmf(a)free.fr>  wrote: >> >> K. Peachey wrote: >>> >>> The user was probably op'ed and saw the messages, since CIA-* is >>> globally +q (quietened) in the channel. >> >> That is it, I was +o. >> >> Is there any point in keeping the CIA bots in #mediawiki ? We might as >> well remove it. >>

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Chad<innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote: We don't use the the #mediawiki instance of CIA-* (it's been broken ever since we moved it out of #mediawiki and into another channel), The only one we use is sitting in #mediawiki-codereview powering codurr. I have no reason to see why that shouldn't sit around till the day we actually kill off the mediawiki repo in svn. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l