Mark Williamson (node.ue@gmail.com) [050811 06:36]:
On 09/08/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Kate (keturner@livejournal.com) [050809 21:57]:
be rejected because of it. more information on greylisting can be found at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/.
And from spam and might-as-well-be-spam just now: 3.3, 18.4, 18.2, 2.6, 2.6, 0.4, 0.4, 4.2, 4.0, 4.0.
David, what do you count as "might as well be spam"?
I think the examples in that particular pile were press releases and cranks who email lots of people that they think might further their cause. Which is technically spam too, I suppose, but not the serious bulk stuff - just people adding wikien-l to their general publicity list.
- d.
Ahh, OK.
I thought perhaps you were labelling legitimate messages as "might as well be spam" because you disagreed with their content ;)
Mark
On 18/08/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Mark Williamson (node.ue@gmail.com) [050811 06:36]:
On 09/08/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Kate (keturner@livejournal.com) [050809 21:57]:
be rejected because of it. more information on greylisting can be found at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/.
And from spam and might-as-well-be-spam just now: 3.3, 18.4, 18.2, 2.6, 2.6, 0.4, 0.4, 4.2, 4.0, 4.0.
David, what do you count as "might as well be spam"?
I think the examples in that particular pile were press releases and cranks who email lots of people that they think might further their cause. Which is technically spam too, I suppose, but not the serious bulk stuff - just people adding wikien-l to their general publicity list.
- d.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org