Yes, and doesn't it mean chaning the policy of meta-wiki?
Hmm, it seems everything is on topic, including software
developement
and administration :-)
I meant if I deleted contents that are personal and not related to development and administration, doesn't it mean I am against the policy of meta-wiki, which says everything is acceptable as the name meta implies?
I guess we don't need dev.wikipedia.org but
trashcan.wikipedia.org for
things people don't dare to delete completely from
wikipedia. Be bolder!
Again, if meat becomes anything but trashcan I would love to contribute to meta. But can we do that without the agreement? Actually, I am not only talking to Kurl but just asking anyone who objects to clean up meta-wikipedia.
--- Takuya Murata takusi@manjiro.net wrote:
Yes, and doesn't it mean chaning the policy of
meta-wiki?
Hmm, it seems everything is on topic, including
software developement
and administration :-)
I meant if I deleted contents that are personal and not related to development and administration, doesn't it mean I am against the policy of meta-wiki, which says everything is acceptable as the name meta implies?
I guess we don't need dev.wikipedia.org but
trashcan.wikipedia.org for
things people don't dare to delete completely from
wikipedia. Be bolder!
Again, if meat becomes anything but trashcan I would love to contribute to meta. But can we do that without the agreement? Actually, I am not only talking to Kurl but just asking anyone who objects to clean up meta-wikipedia.
I object.
These pages do not disturb anyone but you. As long as Jimbo has room on his server, what would you remove pages that *you* think are personals ? Why does it disturb you so much that we are offered a tiny personal space ?
I don't think the encyclopedic wikis it is the right place really to put pov stuff on, for these are public places. There are no limits to povs, and I don't think proper that these pov positions coexist with supposingly neutral articles. For readers could find them pretty easily and wonder over them.
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
--- Takuya Murata takusi@manjiro.net wrote:
Yes, and doesn't it mean chaning the policy of
meta-wiki?
Hmm, it seems everything is on topic, including
software developement
and administration :-)
I meant if I deleted contents that are personal and not related to development and administration, doesn't it mean I am against the policy of meta-wiki, which says everything is acceptable as the name meta implies?
I guess we don't need dev.wikipedia.org but
trashcan.wikipedia.org for
things people don't dare to delete completely from
wikipedia. Be bolder!
Again, if meat becomes anything but trashcan I would love to contribute to meta. But can we do that without the agreement? Actually, I am not only talking to Kurl but just asking anyone who objects to clean up meta-wikipedia.
I object.
These pages do not disturb anyone but you. As long as Jimbo has room on his server, what would you remove pages that *you* think are personals ? Why does it disturb you so much that we are offered a tiny personal space ?
I don't think the encyclopedic wikis it is the right place really to put pov stuff on, for these are public places. There are no limits to povs, and I don't think proper that these pov positions coexist with supposingly neutral articles. For readers could find them pretty easily and wonder over them.
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org