Dear Platonides,
I'm not sure if that is a good practice. How would identifying the version (id) revised?
2011/3/28 Platonides Platonides@gmail.com:
Wilfredo Rodriguez wrote:
Good morning.
If many people work in the process of verification and selection of items, what is the proper way to record the list csv without the following problems occur:
- Repeat entries (Someone reviewed the same article because he did
not know that was already in the list) 2) Create a shared list and easy to edit (We're talking about a list that may be so large that it is impossible to edit)
Thank you very much for your help
User:Wilfredor
Use a hidden category to track the reviewed articles?
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wilfredor wrote:
Dear Platonides,
I'm not sure if that is a good practice. How would identifying the version (id) revised?
The categories map to page titles, which are equivalents to pageids (actually, the category table maps to pageids). You would then pass them to wikitrust in order to get the revision ids. You may need a bit more work for checking /who/ adds that category, but the interface for creating the list is cleaner.
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org