After a first wave of feedback it is clear that we have two different
discussions that need solving:
1. If we use WMF Technical Collaboration budget for Phabricator
improvements, should we invest it the Calendar application? This is a well
framed discussion with a clear deadline for decisions (very soon, or our
FY2015-16 budget will be gone). I have created a task to discuss this
specifically:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T135327
2. If we want to improve the announcement and promotion of Wikimedia tech
events, is the best first step to improve Phabricator Calendar? This is a
complex discussion with many ramifications that we can keep discussing at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T1035
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Legoktm <legoktm.wikipedia(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
If we're going to be investing money into
improving Phabricator upstream
(a great idea IMO), I think we should start with problem areas that
affect a large number of users/developers.
Agreed. If I am proposing improvements around Calendar is because our team
believes that we have a problem affecting the announcement and promotion of
technical activities beyond the circle of usual and core contributors. By
improving this area, we believe we could reach better to more casual
technical contributors in our movement, and reach out better to new
contributors out there.
There's plenty of low-hanging fruit like
non-drag-n-drop file uploads[1].
Agreed. This one is being funded already.
[2] was also mentioned on #wikimedia-tech a few days
ago
Good, I wasn't aware. Is there a task in Wikimedia Phabricator reflecting
the level of need, support, consensus? Feel free to propose it as suggested
in
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T135327
or some of the UI/UX issues Nemo brought up after the
last Phabricator
upgrade[3].
I think
https://secure.phabricator.com/T10926 reflects the essence of the
improvements requested after the Phabricator UX update. It looks like the
discussion so far is more about agreement on UX problems/solutions than
complexity of the solution once agreed, but if there is room for funded
prioritization, that also looks like a good candidate for a proposal.
[1]
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T165#2289766
--
Quim Gil
Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil