...to pop into the current debate about the tags, lets prefer <music>Yeah</music> as well as <math> and <chem> (am I up-to-date or has something been already decided?) for intuition reasons...
Mark Krüger Fichardstrasse 50 60322 Frankfurt am Main T: 069/95530009 E: mark@kruegerbrothers.com
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Mark Krueger wrote:
lets prefer <music> as well as <math> and <chem> for intuition reasons...
Two considerations: - how should tags be handled that have subsidiary attributes like music: <music tempo=50></music>; - and should we allow for a shortened form of some sort, like <math value="e=mc^2" />?
Best, Peter
Brion Vibber wrote:
On Dec 15, 2003, at 16:38, Peter Danenberg wrote:
- and should we allow for a shortened form of some sort, like <math value="e=mc^2" />?
<math>e=mc^2</math> (19 chars)
<math value="e=mc^2 /> (22 chars)
Not only longer, apparently more prone to typo's as well. Add the missing quotation and you end up at 23.
Rob
lets prefer <music> as well as <math> and <chem> for intuition reasons...
Two considerations: how should tags be handled that have subsidiary attributes like
music: <music tempo=50></music>;
I am totally d'accord.
and should we allow for a shortened form of some sort, like <math
value="e=mc^2" />?
I am totally d'accord with Brion:
<math>e=mc^2</math>
no experiments for a couple of chars. World is already too complicated (even after Saddam has been caught ;-) )
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org