On Sep 19, 2015 11:15 AM, "bawolff" <bawolff+wn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
maintain is an ambiguous word. WMF has some responsibility to all the
extensions deployed on cluster (imo). If Devunt (and any others who
were knowledgeable of the Josa extension) disappeared, WMF would
default to becoming responsible for the security and critical issues
in the extension (However, I wouldn't hold them responsible for
feature requests or minor bugs).
LDAP is used on wikitech, and some similar services. It would be nice
if teams that most directly interact with the extension (I suppose
that's labs, maybe security) help with maintenance [Maybe they already
do]. I don't necessarily think they have a responsibility to (beyond
critical issues, security, etc), but if the teams in question aren't
too busy, it is always nice to give back to projects that we use.
Ideally the security team would take on this extension. Unfortunately we
just don't have the capacity to address anything except significant
security issues right now.
--
-bawolff
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Yongmin Hong <lists(a)revi.pe.kr> wrote:
> Deployed on wmf cluster does not necessarilly means wmf has to maintain
it.
> A simple example: [[mw:Extension:Josa]]. It's
maintained by 3rd party
> developer independant from WMF. For example, (IIRC/AFAIK,) WMF has no
> staffs with Korean knowledge.
>
> [[Extension:Josa]]:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Josa
>
> --
> revi
>
https://revi.me
> -- Sent from Android --
> 2015. 9. 19. 오후 5:27에 "Thomas Mulhall"
<thomasmulhall410(a)yahoo.xn--com>-4f21ay07k
작성:
>
>> Since this is deployed on wikitech It should be maintained by Wikimedia
>> since it is unmaintained and its better that Wikimedia maintain it
because
>> they have more staff that can review and
because they have more
experience
>> in doing reviews and code review.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, 19 September 2015, 8:39, Keegan Peterzell <
>> kpeterzell(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Keegan Peterzell <
>> kpeterzell(a)wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, bluntly put, since LDAP is how most non-WMF staff sign into
>> >> phabricator, I'd say it's become an essential extension.
>> >>
>> >
>> Even more technically, this (LDAP) is for people committing to Gerrit
and
>> adding to Wikitech. These LDAP accounts can
tie in CentralAuth through
>> oAuth.
>>
>> But again, yes, LDAP should be some sort of "maintained" in the sense
that
Greg G. describes, and I think it will be.
--
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Product
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l