-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
OpenFact's Wikipedia Status ( http://tinyurl.com/48a5m ) is the original Wikipedia Status page. However, it suffers from a huge problem: it is prohibitively unwieldly to use. The solution? Create a more streamlined application designed for the exact task of allowing the community to report on contingency issues. Yup... it's called WikiStatus for lack of a more creative name.
You can view an online version of it here: http://tinyurl.com/a62lu and the source code is here: http://tinyurl.com/b9z8n
I'm not sure when/how OpenFacts became the de facto standard for status reporting, but it would be cool if we could add a link to WikiStatus from the standard error page. Of course, it's really new software (I consider it alpha quality) and it probably needs to be audited, but when there's a problem, there should be multiple contingency sites.
Please check it out! Thanks. :D
- -- Edward Z. Yang Personal: edwardzyang@thewritingpot.com SN:Ambush Commander Website: http://www.thewritingpot.com/ GPGKey:0x869C48DA http://www.thewritingpot.com/gpgpubkey.asc 3FA8 E9A9 7385 B691 A6FC B3CB A933 BE7D 869C 48DA
Re: choice of term "WikiStatus"
I think it would be good to make sure we don't equate the world of wikis with Wikipedia. Wikipedia may be the most well-known and important wiki, but the world of wikis as I'm sure everyone here knows is much broader and more diverse than even Wikipedia.
I'm making this point after seeing some (influential?!) bloggers start equating wikis with Wikipedia, which helps nobody. (Neither will Wikipedia benefit from being equated with the LA Times desaster, nor will wikis be helped by being viewed through Encyclopedia glasses.)
I recognize that you use WikiStatus only as a shorthand for Wikipedia Status and spell it out most of the time, but sometimes acronyms take on a life of their own, say if you register a domain for it.
Thanks, Dirk
At 26.11.2005, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
OpenFact's Wikipedia Status ( http://tinyurl.com/48a5m ) is the original Wikipedia Status page. However, it suffers from a huge problem: it is prohibitively unwieldly to use. The solution? Create a more streamlined application designed for the exact task of allowing the community to report on contingency issues. Yup... it's called WikiStatus for lack of a more creative name.
You can view an online version of it here: http://tinyurl.com/a62lu and the source code is here: http://tinyurl.com/b9z8n
I'm not sure when/how OpenFacts became the de facto standard for status reporting, but it would be cool if we could add a link to WikiStatus from the standard error page. Of course, it's really new software (I consider it alpha quality) and it probably needs to be audited, but when there's a problem, there should be multiple contingency sites.
Please check it out! Thanks. :D
Edward Z. Yang Personal: edwardzyang@thewritingpot.com SN:Ambush Commander Website: http://www.thewritingpot.com/ GPGKey:0x869C48DA http://www.thewritingpot.com/gpgpubkey.asc 3FA8 E9A9 7385 B691 A6FC B3CB A933 BE7D 869C 48DA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDh9quqTO+fYacSNoRAmKQAJ4654F+d8NrScr40cwdek8x7Mky8wCfa3RU beH7MlBjYFiqejEZChf8EnA= =S57w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Dr. Dirk Riehle | Bayave Software GmbH | http://www.bayave.de Contact: dirk@riehle.org | +49 172 184 8755 | http://www.riehle.org Interested in wiki research? Please see http://www.wikisym.org!
On 11/26/05, Dirk Riehle dirk@riehle.org wrote:
Re: choice of term "WikiStatus"
I recognize that you use WikiStatus only as a shorthand for Wikipedia Status and spell it out most of the time, but sometimes acronyms take on a life of their own, say if you register a domain for it.
So wikipstatus.com, with a silent p?
You mean the same way that people assumed that "Semapedia" was my work? (It's not) :-)
Or the way so many programs are called "WinSomething" if they run on windows and MacSomething if they run on Mac, and LinThis and LinThat?
--simon
On Nov 26, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Dirk Riehle wrote:
Re: choice of term "WikiStatus"
I think it would be good to make sure we don't equate the world of wikis with Wikipedia. Wikipedia may be the most well-known and important wiki, but the world of wikis as I'm sure everyone here knows is much broader and more diverse than even Wikipedia.
I'm making this point after seeing some (influential?!) bloggers start equating wikis with Wikipedia, which helps nobody. (Neither will Wikipedia benefit from being equated with the LA Times desaster, nor will wikis be helped by being viewed through Encyclopedia glasses.)
I recognize that you use WikiStatus only as a shorthand for Wikipedia Status and spell it out most of the time, but sometimes acronyms take on a life of their own, say if you register a domain for it.
Thanks, Dirk
If a Wiki is a site within the WWW USING a wiki, then wikipedia is not even a wiki. Then MediaWiki is (?) the most well-known wiki.
Heinz
Dirk Riehle schrieb:
Re: choice of term "WikiStatus"
I think it would be good to make sure we don't equate the world of wikis with Wikipedia. Wikipedia may be the most well-known and important wiki, but the world of wikis as I'm sure everyone here knows is much broader and more diverse than even Wikipedia.
On 11/27/05, Heinz h-j.luecking@t-online.de wrote:
If a Wiki is a site within the WWW USING a wiki, then wikipedia is not even a wiki. Then MediaWiki is (?) the most well-known wiki.
mediawiki is not an wiki, except mediawiki.org :)
I'm glad we found a debate in which anyone can contribute anything without risking to move this debate Offtopic....
followup policy-l instead of this list anyone?
Mathias
Edward Z. Yang wrote:
OpenFact's Wikipedia Status ( http://tinyurl.com/48a5m ) is the original Wikipedia Status page. However, it suffers from a huge problem: it is prohibitively unwieldly to use.
More importantly, it's on an unreliable, buggy, insecure old version of MediaWiki on somebody else's site which is less reliable than ours. That's why the links to it were removed some time ago.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org