-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Simetrical wrote:
On 5/7/07, brion(a)pobox.com <brion(a)pobox.com>
wrote:
4 previously passing test(s) now FAILING! :(
* Section extraction test with bogus heading (section 1) [Introduced between
06-May-2007 07:15:17, 1.11alpha (r21924) and 07-May-2007 07:15:18, 1.11alpha (r21950)]
* Section extraction test with bogus heading (section 2) [Introduced between
06-May-2007 07:15:17, 1.11alpha (r21924) and 07-May-2007 07:15:18, 1.11alpha (r21950)]
* Section extraction test with bogus <nowiki> heading (section 1)
[Introduced between 06-May-2007 07:15:17, 1.11alpha (r21924) and 07-May-2007 07:15:18,
1.11alpha (r21950)]
* Section extraction test with bogus <nowiki> heading (section 2)
[Introduced between 06-May-2007 07:15:17, 1.11alpha (r21924) and 07-May-2007 07:15:18,
1.11alpha (r21950)]
I broke this, but I'm not sure if it's intended behavior or not. The
parsertests seem to think that text on the end of a wikitext section
line should be illegal; is that correct?
Yes.
Currently templates at least
are allowed there, which presumably means arbitrary text, and those
seem to be used not infrequently.
That bug is likely a side effect of template processing, and is
certainly neither intended nor legal.
== Heading == text
be banned or not?
Yes.
If so, should
== Heading == {{template}}
Yes.
, given that the template can contain comments or
other permitted
material?
Those would also be illegal; any allowance would be a side-effect of the
current multi-pass parsing.
- -- brion vibber (brion @
wikimedia.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGQIFrwRnhpk1wk44RAkQ4AKDgQK+U/ZcXmuyXr6PqxNEcuwELgQCg0jCo
bwIbABdRRZAHuEEOVou1Nto=
=3zdY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----