Hey,
Having a tag implementation next to the current parser function one would be
acceptable. Replacing the parser function by a tag extension is not. So that
would not solve the current problem.
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
*
http://blog.bn2vs.com
*
http://wiki.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69
66 65!
--
On 19 July 2010 14:34, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why not use a tag instead of a parserfunction?
You could have one point per line, with parameters (which could be
named) separated by pipes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit
sprint.com/first --
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-user mailing list
Semediawiki-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user