Hey,

Having a tag implementation next to the current parser function one would be acceptable. Replacing the parser function by a tag extension is not. So that would not solve the current problem.

Cheers

-- Jeroen De Dauw * http://blog.bn2vs.com * http://wiki.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 66 65! --

On 19 July 2010 14:34, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:

Why not use a tag instead of a parserfunction? You could have one point per line, with parameters (which could be named) separated by pipes.

---

This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-user mailing list Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user