I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_R...
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_R...
Is no-one at all interested in RDFa?
No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"?
Well I don't have any experience in RDFa, but looking at the proposal, it seems like something we should do.
*-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo@gmail.com
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.comwrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen < daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and
ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/** Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.**1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0
Is no-one at all interested in RDFa?
No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"?
-- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/]
______________________________**_________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On 9 May 2013 18:29, Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen < daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and
ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/** Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.**1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0
Is no-one at all interested in RDFa?
No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"?
I'm in favour. :-) Seems a sensible change all round, and there don't appear to be reasons against.
J.
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_R...
This -- and more -- in: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/63106/
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org