Seems like a good summary: http://www.wired.com/2016/05/the-end-of-code/
Comments welcome, especially from Wikimedia AI experts who are working on ORES.
Pine
On Friday, May 20, 2016, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like a good summary: http://www.wired.com/2016/05/the-end-of-code/
Comments welcome, especially from Wikimedia AI experts who ae working on ORES.
Pine
Its rather over the top. But if we are going to hype something to insane levels, at least machine learning is more interesting than the cloud.
Historically, publicitly of AI research goes in boom and bust cycles. Eventually people will realize that the singularity has not arrived (yet!), get bored, and convince themselves that some other fad is going to rewrite society as we know it*
*To be clear, im not saying ML isnt cool - it is very cool. But like all technologies it has strengths and weaknessess. It will not usher in a new era that is fundamentally different from the current. Or at least there is quite a ways to go before we get to that point.
--bawolff
I see only an ad to support Wired. Purodha
On 20.05.2016 20:11, Pine W wrote:
Seems like a good summary: http://www.wired.com/2016/05/the-end-of-code/
Comments welcome, especially from Wikimedia AI experts who are working on ORES.
Pine _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Just a quick thought that I shared in IRC earlier.
AI isn't magical. It's pretty cool, but you're not going to have a
conversation with ORES https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Objective_Revision_Evaluation_Service.
It's not false that we are closer to strong "conversational" AI than ever before. Still, in practical terms, we're pretty far away from not needing to program anymore. I find that articles like this are more fantastical than informative. I guess it is interesting to think about where we'll be when we can have an abstract conversation with a computer system rather than the rigid specifics of programming, but I'm with Brian -- this seems to be a cycle. Though, I'd say the media does boom and bust, but the research carries on relatively consistently since AI researchers are usually less interested in the hype.
In the ORES project, we're using the most simplistic "AIs" available -- classifiers. Still these dumb AIs can still help us to do amazing things (e.g. review all of RecentChanges in 50x faster or augment article histories with information about the *type of change* made). IMO, it's these amazing and powerful things that dumb, non-conversational AIs can do that is very powerful and a little scary http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/opinion/the-real-bias-built-in-at-facebook.html. We're hardly taking advantage of that at all. I think that's where the next big revolution with AI is taking place right now. It's going to change a lot of things and infect many aspects of our life (and in many ways it already has).
-Aaron
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Purodha Blissenbach < purodha@blissenbach.org> wrote:
I see only an ad to support Wired. Purodha
On 20.05.2016 20:11, Pine W wrote:
Seems like a good summary: http://www.wired.com/2016/05/the-end-of-code/
Comments welcome, especially from Wikimedia AI experts who are working on ORES.
Pine _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org