"Tim Starling" ts4294967296@hotmail.com schrieb:
Jimbo said he wanted it. As far as I'm concerned, developers are still answerable to him not the other way around. If you want to hold a site wide vote, go for your life. If there's enough support, we'll delete the wiki.
No, Jimbo did not see that, all he said was that "I have no objections to it." That's quite a bit different from wanting it. Also, the developers should not be answerable to Jimbo (nor the other way around). They should be answerable to the community.
My personal opinion on Klingon is a hesitating 'for', where however my reasoning has nothing to do with 'embarassment' but with the question whether it's really a language used for communication. Regarding the other languages, I am in favor of deleting Toki Pona, see no reason to keep Serbocroatian, and would not object against deletion of Moldovan.
Andre Engels
Andre Engels wrote:
"Tim Starling" ts4294967296@hotmail.com schrieb:
imbo said he wanted it. As far as I'm concerned, developers are still answerable to him not the other way around. If you want to hold a site wide vote, go for your life. If there's enough support, we'll delete the wiki.
No, Jimbo did not see that, all he said was that "I have no objections to it." That's quite a bit different from wanting it. Also, the developers should not be answerable to Jimbo (nor the other way around). They should be answerable to the community.
This sounds like an argument about which conflicting passage of the Bible is more valid. :-)
My personal opinion on Klingon is a hesitating 'for', where however my reasoning has nothing to do with 'embarassment' but with the question whether it's really a language used for communication. Regarding the other languages, I am in favor of deleting Toki Pona, see no reason to keep Serbocroatian, and would not object against deletion of Moldovan.
These are supportable arguments. I also have doubts about the validity of treating Bosnian as a separate language.
Ec
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org